I just finished reading a biography on Isaac Newton. A lot has already been written about Newton, and I don’t have a lot of original insight to contribute, but I’ll briefly summarize my thoughts. The book (“Isaac Newton” by James Gleick) was excellent, and my only complaint is that it was too short. It chronicles Newton’s life from birth – in an obscure village farmhouse, to obscure parents – to his death at age 84, at which point he had grown relatively wealthy, powerful, and famous. Even at his death, though, his legendary status and place in history was just beginning.

Newton was brilliant, but also a loner. He never married and had few friends, and he spent much of his time alone, reading and performing experiments and writing. Much of what he wrote was entirely private and he did not publish, yet it was groundbreaking in scope. In a nutshell, Newton single-handedly invented calculus, creating concepts like derivatives (measuring the rate of change over time) and integrals (measuring the area under a curve) and connecting the two; he was the first to set forth an accurate theory of light by using a prism to show that white light is composed of the spectrum of all colors of the rainbow; and he effectively “discovered” gravity. Without going into a lot of detail, it’s hard to even comprehend these achievements without full historical context.

Before Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, and Newton, and a few other remarkable scientists who lived in the 1500s and 1600s, it was generally taken for granted that the earth is stationary, that other planets, the moon, and the sun (and the stars) all move around the earth in regular cycles, and that there is a fundamental distinction between the imperfect earth and the perfect celestial sphere, or series of spheres, in the heavens (perfect in part because of their religious association with God). In Newton’s time, it had only recently been discovered that the planets, including Earth, move around the sun (Copernicus), and that these orbits are not even perfect circles but are elliptical (Kepler). The use of the telescope also revealed lunar craters and other imperfections, as well as moons orbiting other planets like Jupiter (Galileo). This was all an affront to Christianity and its view of the world. But there were still enormous questions about nature: why did the planets orbit at all? What was keeping them from flying apart at great speed? The concept of a “force” of attraction hadn’t been invented yet – and there was argument about whether space was even a vacuum or was filled with the mysterious “ether.” Newton showed decisively that such a force existed (gravity), even if he couldn’t explain its cause, and that space is a vacuum – there is no ether. Furthermore, matter is the same everywhere in the universe, whether on earth or other planets or stars: it is all composed of the same types of matter and obeys the same natural laws.

Setting forth well-articulated theories of gravity and optics, and creating a new, more powerful mathematics are not even Newton’s biggest achievements. It was his insistence on using data and math – to measure things that were previously unmeasured – that was truly a colossal shift in the way that societies approached nature. Newton, more than any other person, is responsible for taking what was previously called “philosophy” and hammering out concrete rules for how to measure things and how to approach questions scientifically, so that theories could be tested and disproven using evidence and data.

There have been many things written about Newton, but a famous poem by Alexander Pope probably summarizes his life and his contributions as well as anything else:

“Nature and nature’s laws lay hid in night;

God said, Let Newton be! and all was light.”

The starting point for any discussion about spaceports is a definition, so that we know what we’re talking about. In its most general sense, a spaceport is just a site for launching spacecraft. In addition to launches, the site would typically test, store, and perform maintenance on spacecraft, and may also have related facilities and operations for storing and/or processing liquid rocket fuel. A spaceport may even have on-site tenants that rent space as part of their ongoing launch operations.

Spaceports are a relatively recent concept, but the idea – and the word itself – is just an extension of other types of transportation hubs that have existed for hundreds or even thousands of years. Airports are similarly sites for airplanes taking off and landing; seaports are places where ships launch and return (and where ships may be built, repaired, stored, maintained, and so on). The analogy for space travel is clear.

So what kind of spacecraft qualify? There are a few different types or categories for spaceports based on the method of launch, as well as what is being launched. The majority of spaceports support a vertical rocket launch, but there are a few – which appear to be exclusively in the United States – that allow for a horizontal launch, e.g., a vehicle that takes off on a runway like an airplane but that is capable of reaching space.

Along similar lines, spacecraft can have a human crew (manned) or no crew (unmanned). They are also designed for different purposes and can reach different heights: sub-orbital or orbital, or beyond.

As of 2022, the total number of spaceports worldwide is just 35. Of these, 15 are in the US, from locations as far-flung as Cape Canaveral Air Force Station or the Kennedy Space Center in Florida to the Pacific Spaceport Complex on Kodiak Island in Alaska. It’s worth noting the other countries that have at least one spaceport, given that it’s somewhat rare: Russia, Kazakhstan, China, Mongolia, Japan, India, Brazil, New Zealand, French Guiana, Kenya, Norway, and South Korea.

So can anyone just build their own spaceport?

I’ve been thinking about spaceports a lot recently.

Not sure why, exactly – I think that they’ve coincidentally been brought to my attention from several independent sources around the same time. I just finished re-reading Isaac Asimov’s Foundation novels (for the hundredth time) in which there are frequent references to spaceports, a necessity in a Galactic Empire spanning around 25 million inhabited worlds. I also recently read an article in The Atlantic about a (very real) spaceport being planned in Melness, at the very northern border of Scotland, and its economic impacts on the local population. And of course I try to keep up with rocketry news in general, including SpaceX and its spaceport at Boca Chica, as well as various launches out of Spaceport America in New Mexico.

All of this makes me a bit curious about the history and origin of spaceports, as well as the rules governing them. When I first got into rocketry, I knew absolutely nothing. Some might say I still know nothing, and this would not be an inaccurate characterization. But in the beginning, no question was too stupid. How do you go about building a rocket? Can anyone just launch a rocket, from anywhere? Is it legal? Are there any rules?

Having never given more than a cursory thought to spaceports before, I’m in a similarly ignorant position. What exactly is a spaceport? What are the criteria to qualify as one? Can anyone – with sufficient time and resources – just build one? Can it only be in certain locations, or could it be anywhere? What does the government have to say about spaceports, if anything?

Time to find out!

I haven’t had a chance to update this blog in a while, which seems to be a common fate for most blogs. I’ve just been uncommonly busy. 

My last update was a few months back in August 2022, shortly after I attempted another L3 certification. As noted there, it was a failed attempt, but as always I learned some important lessons. 

The last post before that was from June 2022 when I attended the 40th annual launch of Large Dangerous Rocket Ships (LDRS) in southern California, way out in the high desert. This was the first time I’d attended a big national launch like this. 

On a personal note, the last six months or so have been nonstop. Shortly after LDRS, we moved from Los Angeles back to the midwest to be closer to family (all in the Chicago area) and the cross-country move, with an 18 month old toddler, was eventful to say the least. We spent fall getting settled into our new home in a new community, figuring out childcare for our daughter, and exploring the area while the weather was still relatively warm. Later in the fall I took another math class, differential equations, which was incredibly demanding and time-consuming, but I successfully completed it – another math class under my belt, after taking calculus I, II, and III, as well as linear algebra last year. 

I still have a lot more classes to take if I want to knock out all of the math and science pre-requisites (one more math, a three-part physics sequence, and four or five engineering classes), but working my way through them slowly is better than not doing it at all. And to be honest, slowly – one class at a time – is all I can possibly muster right now, given my schedule.

Now that this most recent class is over and we’re much more settled into our new place, though, I really want to get back into rocketry. I still have that L3 certification to finish, and I have half a dozen other rocketry projects I want to dive into as well. I’ll be sure to post more updates accordingly!